1920 Agency Talk to us
ServicesWorkHow we workContact

Online ads

Meta Ads vs Google Ads: Which Should You Run First?

By 1920 Agency Editorial Team · Reviewed by Rana Zain Usman · Published

The short answer

Run Google Ads first if people already search for what you sell, because search ads reach buyers while they are looking. Run Meta (Facebook and Instagram) ads first if few people search for it yet or it sells on sight. Meta's clicks and leads usually cost less, about $0.60 a click and $27.39 a lead against $5.42 and $66.69 for search in LocaliQ's 2026 benchmarks, but those figures count different things, so judge each platform on cost per sale or qualified lead and start with one.

Which should a small business run first?

Start with Google Ads when people already search for what you sell, and with Meta ads when they don't yet. Google shows ads to people typing a need into a search box. Meta shows ads to people scrolling Facebook and Instagram who match an audience, before they look for anything. Pick the platform that matches how your customers find you, run it until it pays, and add the second one later.

Your situation Start with Why
Urgent or planned services (repairs, dental, legal, accounting) Google Search People search when the need arises; in eligible categories Local Services Ads charge per lead
A product people already search for by name or type Google Search or Shopping Shopping ads show photo, price and store name, using your Merchant Center product data instead of keywords
A visual product, an impulse buy or a gift Meta The product sells on sight, and Meta's Sales objective can optimise for purchases
A new category nobody searches for yet Meta There is no search demand to capture, so you have to create it
Lead generation with a short form (quotes, consultations, events) Either; check search demand first Meta instant forms are quick to send, while search leads come from people already looking
A budget that can buy only a handful of results a week One platform, one campaign Splitting a small budget starves both platforms of the data they learn from

To check whether demand exists, Google's Keyword Planner shows monthly search estimates and the average cost of a click for a keyword. It sits inside Google Ads, and Google's help page says you must finish account setup, including billing details, before you can use it.

How do Google Ads and Meta Ads differ?

Google Ads mostly answers searches, and Meta ads mostly interrupt a feed. That one difference drives what you write, what you pay for and how quickly results show.

Google Ads Meta ads (Facebook, Instagram)
Reaches people who Are searching now, or watching YouTube and browsing Google's partner sites Match an audience by location, age, interests and behaviour, or have visited your site
Main targeting Keywords and search terms; products from a Merchant Center feed Audience signals, with Meta's automation finding people likely to act
Creative you need Text ads, landing pages that match each search, product feed for Shopping Images, short vertical video and copy, refreshed often
Where ads show Search results, YouTube, Gmail, Display and partner sites Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Meta's partner apps
Typical first campaign Search on buyer keywords Sales or Leads campaign with 2-3 creatives
Works best for Capturing demand that already exists Creating demand and bringing visitors back

What do Meta ads and Google ads cost in 2026?

Meta clicks cost about a ninth as much as search clicks, and Meta leads about 40% of what search leads cost, according to LocaliQ's 2026 benchmarks. The gap changes a lot by industry. LocaliQ, the marketing company behind WordStream, publishes averages from its customers' campaigns. Its search report (updated 1 June 2026) combines Google Ads and Microsoft Ads data. Its Facebook report (updated 23 September 2026) splits results by campaign objective. Neither page states the data period or the number of campaigns.

Industry Search CPC Search cost per lead Meta CPC (traffic campaigns) Meta cost per lead (lead campaigns)
All industries $5.42 $66.69 $0.60 $27.39
Beauty & Personal Care $4.62 $39.25 $0.50 $50.91
Dentists & Dental Services $8.00 $72.97 $0.61 $61.56
Education & Instruction $4.81 $77.48 $0.70 $26.31
Health & Fitness $6.17 $67.36 $0.64 $27.11
Home & Home Improvement $8.33 $90.92 $0.63 $42.95
Personal Services $7.17 $54.60 $0.67 $38.09
Physicians & Surgeons $4.76 $40.04 $0.61 $32.14
Real Estate $3.22 $102.51 $0.55 $13.74

Conversion rates are closer than the click prices suggest: 8.18% of search clicks became leads, against 8.54% of clicks on Meta lead campaigns. Attorneys pay the most for search in the report, $9.87 a click and $131.63 a lead, and LocaliQ publishes no Meta cost per lead for that industry.

These are averages from one firm's customers. Your costs depend on your market, offer, ads and landing page. Treat the table as a starting point for a budget, not a forecast.

Why "Meta is cheaper" is the wrong comparison

Most comparison pages put Meta's cost per click next to Google's and conclude that Meta is cheaper. Those two numbers measure different things, and the gap shrinks or reverses once you look at leads.

  • The clicks are not the same click. LocaliQ's Meta cost per click comes from traffic campaigns, which Meta optimises for clicks. LocaliQ itself leaves conversion figures out of those campaigns, because a traffic objective "often results in higher cost per lead". A search click comes from someone who typed the need into Google.
  • Per lead, the gap narrows from about 9 times to about 2.4 times. Overall, a search click costs 9 times a Meta click ($5.42 against $0.60), but a search lead costs 2.4 times a Meta lead ($66.69 against $27.39). For dentists the lead gap is only $72.97 against $61.56.
  • In some industries search is cheaper per lead. Beauty & Personal Care pays $39.25 a lead on search and $50.91 on Meta.
  • A lead is not the same lead. LocaliQ's Meta lead campaigns drive form fills, messages, calls and conversions, often through instant forms that people send without leaving Facebook or Instagram. Its search leads are calls, chats, form fills and emails from people who searched. Which one turns into more sales depends on your follow-up, not the platform.

The figure that settles the question is cost per sale or per qualified lead, measured in your own account. If you sell over the phone or by WhatsApp, that means recording which leads became customers, which is what our online ads management sets up before any budget is raised.

How much budget does each platform need to learn?

Both platforms optimise with machine learning, and both need a steady flow of results to do it. Meta says an ad set usually leaves its learning phase "after about 50 results in the week after the ad set's last significant edit". If an ad set can't get there, it shows "Learning limited", and editing it during learning resets the count. Google recommends judging Smart Bidding over periods with at least 30 conversions, such as a month or longer, or 50 for Target ROAS.

Multiply those counts by the cost of one result and you get the budget behind each rule. This is our arithmetic from the platforms' own numbers:

Your cost per lead or sale Meta: 50 results in a week, one ad set Google: 30 conversions to judge Smart Bidding
$15 $750 a week (about $107 a day) $450 over the period
$30 $1,500 a week (about $214 a day) $900 over the period
$60 $3,000 a week (about $429 a day) $1,800 over the period
$100 $5,000 a week (about $714 a day) $3,000 over the period

At LocaliQ's all-industry averages, that is about $1,370 a week for one Meta lead ad set and about $2,000 to collect 30 search leads. Many small businesses can't afford that on one platform, let alone two, and an agency's fee comes on top: our guide to what a Facebook ads agency costs sets published fees against these budgets. So:

  • Run one platform, one campaign and, on Meta, as few ad sets as you can. Every extra ad set divides the results.
  • Expect "Learning limited" on a small budget, and judge results over longer periods rather than day to day.
  • Don't edit while it learns. Meta warns that frequent budget changes can send an ad set back into learning.
  • Never drop to clicks to "help it learn". Keep the objective on the result you pay for, a purchase or a lead, and accept slower learning; a traffic campaign learns fast but finds clickers, not buyers.

How do daily budgets actually spend?

Neither platform treats a daily budget as a hard daily limit. Both spend more on busy days and less on quiet ones, and both cap the total over a longer period.

Google Ads Meta
On one day Up to 2 times your average daily budget Up to 75% over your daily budget (175% at most)
Over the longer period No more than 30.4 times the average daily budget in a month No more than 7 times the daily budget in a week ending Saturday at midnight
Example at $20 a day Up to $40 on a busy day; $608 at most in a month Up to $35 on a busy day; $140 at most in a week

Sources: Google's overdelivery page and Meta's daily budgets page.

This matters because some well-known comparisons are out of date. WordStream's 2023 Meta-versus-Google guide, one of the strongest results for this search, still says Meta "may spend up to 25% more than your daily budget on a given day". Meta's help page now says up to 75%. If your account must not go over a fixed monthly figure, set the daily budget from the monthly or weekly cap, not the daily number.

What tracking does each platform need before you spend?

Each platform optimises for the event you report to it. If that event is wrong or missing, it optimises for the wrong people.

  • Google Ads: conversion tracking on the thank-you page or purchase, plus call tracking if the phone matters. For lead businesses, enhanced conversions for leads sends hashed lead details when the form is submitted, then matches leads that later become customers back to the ad. Since 15 June 2026 these uploads go through Google's Data Manager API instead of the Google Ads API.
  • Meta: the pixel plus the Conversions API, which sends events from your server or CRM. Meta says using both creates a more reliable connection. To optimise for leads that become customers, Meta's Conversion Leads integration works only with instant forms. It asks for at least 200 leads a month, a target stage reached within 28 days, and CRM data uploaded at least daily.

Below 200 leads a month you will usually optimise Meta for leads, not for customers. That makes your follow-up the filter: a fast reply, qualifying questions and a booking link. Our guide to automating lead follow-up covers how to connect Meta and Google lead forms to a CRM so no lead waits.

Which businesses face targeting limits on both platforms?

Housing, employment and credit or financial products have restricted targeting on both platforms. If you sell in one of these, budget and audience plans need to allow for it from day one.

  • Google: under its personalized advertising policy, housing, employment and consumer finance ads in the United States and Canada can't target by age, gender, marital status, parental status or ZIP code.
  • Meta: Special Ad Categories cover financial products and services, employment, housing, and social issues, elections or politics. For the first three, targeting by age, gender, ZIP or postal code, lookalike audiences and some detailed interests is limited or unavailable for ads reaching the United States, Canada and some European countries.

Declare the category whenever your ads fit one. Meta's page says a social issue, election or political campaign that doesn't select its category is disapproved, and the narrower audience changes what a lead costs.

When should you run both, and in what order?

Add the second platform once the first has reached your target cost per sale or lead for a few weeks in a row. Running both from day one halves the data each one learns from and makes it hard to tell which is working.

A common order for service businesses:

  1. Google Search first, on the keywords buyers use, to capture the demand that already exists.
  2. Meta second, first to reach people who visited the site and didn't enquire, then to reach new people who look like your customers.
  3. Separate budgets and tracking for each, so a sale is credited where it came from. Both platforms will claim some of the same sales, so check totals against your own sales records.

For online stores the order often flips: Meta's Sales objective first to find buyers for a product people don't search for by name, then Google Shopping once people start searching for the brand.

The setting that matters more than the platform

The biggest waste we see in ad accounts is not the wrong platform but the wrong objective. A sales campaign set to optimise for link clicks or traffic finds people who click, not people who buy. Both platforms do what they are told. The objective tells them what to look for.

For the footwear brand Muzaree, 1920 Agency runs Meta ads on the Sales objective, optimising for purchases rather than clicks, and reads every campaign back from Meta to check it against the plan before it goes live. The Muzaree case study shows how the store and the ads work together. Whichever platform you choose, check three settings before launch: the objective, the event it optimises for, and that the event is actually firing.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

Is Google Ads better than Facebook ads?

Neither is better in general. Google Ads is usually better when people already search for what you sell, because it reaches them at the moment of need. Facebook and Instagram ads are usually better for creating demand, for products that sell on sight and for reaching people again after a visit.

Which is cheaper, Meta ads or Google ads?

Meta is cheaper per click and usually per lead: LocaliQ's 2026 benchmarks put Meta traffic campaigns at $0.60 a click and Meta lead campaigns at $27.39 a lead, against $5.42 and $66.69 for search ads. It is not cheaper in every industry, and a search lead often has more intent, so compare cost per sale or qualified lead in your own account.

Are Meta ads and Google ads the same?

No. They are separate platforms with separate accounts, auctions and billing. Google Ads shows ads on Google Search, YouTube, Gmail and partner sites, mostly matched to what people search for; Meta ads show on Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and partner apps, matched to who people are and what they do.

Which is easier, Meta ads or Google ads?

Meta is usually quicker to launch because you choose an objective, an audience and creative, but it needs a steady supply of new images and video. Google Search needs keyword research, negative keywords and a landing page that matches each search, but text ads are easier to produce. Both need conversion tracking set up correctly before spending.

How much should I spend to test Meta or Google ads?

Work back from the cost of one result. Meta says an ad set leaves its learning phase after about 50 results in a week, so a $30 lead means roughly $1,500 a week for one ad set. Google recommends judging Smart Bidding over a period with at least 30 conversions. If that is out of reach, run one campaign and accept slower learning rather than splitting the budget.

Should a local business run Google or Facebook ads?

A local business that answers urgent or planned needs, such as repairs, dental care or legal help, usually starts with Google, because people search for those services. In eligible categories, Google's Local Services Ads charge per lead rather than per click. Facebook and Instagram suit local offers people do not search for, such as a new class, event or menu.

Can I run Meta and Google ads at the same time?

Yes, and many businesses end up running both. Start with one until it reaches your target cost per result for a few weeks, then add the second with its own budget and tracking, so you can see what each platform brings in.